File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/relat/05/p05-1020_relat.xml
Size: 2,011 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 14:15:53
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="P05-1020"> <Title>Machine Learning for Coreference Resolution: From Local Classification to Global Ranking</Title> <Section position="3" start_page="157" end_page="157" type="relat"> <SectionTitle> 2 Related Work </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> As mentioned before, our approach differs from the standard approach primarily by (1) explicitly learning a ranker and (2) optimizing for clustering-level accuracy. In this section we will focus on discussing related work along these two dimensions.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> Ranking candidate partitions. Although we are not aware of any previous attempt on training a available computing resources.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="2"> ranking model using global features of an NP partition, there is some related work on partition ranking where the score of a partition is computed via a heuristic function of the probabilities of its NP pairs being coreferent.2 For instance, Harabagiu et al. (2001) introduce a greedy algorithm for finding the highest-scored partition by performing a beam search in the space of possible partitions. At each step of this search process, candidate partitions are ranked based on their heuristically computed scores.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="3"> Optimizing for clustering-level accuracy. Ng and Cardie (2002a) attempt to optimize their rule-based coreference classifier for clustering-level accuracy, essentially by finding a subset of the learned rules that performs the best on held-out data with respect to the target coreference scoring program.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="4"> Strube and M&quot;uller (2003) propose a similar idea, but aim instead at finding a subset of the available features with which the resulting coreference classifier yields the best clustering-level accuracy on held-out data. To our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to optimize a ranker for clustering-level accuracy.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>