File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/intro/96/c96-1052_intro.xml
Size: 1,857 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 14:06:00
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="C96-1052"> <Title>A Computational Model of Incremental Utterance Production in Task-Oriented Dialogues</Title> <Section position="4" start_page="0" end_page="304" type="intro"> <SectionTitle> 2 Related Research </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> Recent studies of human speech production (Levelt 1989) show that human speakers frequetatly use the incremental strategy of utterance production. This paper is concerned with a computational model of incremental utterance production. Computational models for the incremental syntactic formulation of a sentence were proposed (Kempen and HoenKamp 1987; De Smedt and Kempen 1991). Although incremental syntactic formulation is an important issue, we do not address this here.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> POPEL is a parallel and incremental natural language generation system (Finkler and Schauder 1992; Reithinger 1992). In POPEL, the &quot;what to say&quot; component determines the content to be generated and gradually carries it over to the &quot;how to say&quot; component, which formulates a sentence incrementally. POPEL can generate dis- null courses using eontextuM information, tlowever, it d(les not allow for the line structure ()f discourse prevailing in st)oken diMogues. We l)resent a eomlmtational model of incremental utterance l)roduetion using the line structure of discourse. Carletta, Caley, and Isard (1993) proi)osed an architecture for time-constrained la.nguage production. As for phenomena peculiar to st)oken dialogues, they focused on tlesil;C/Ltion an(l self-tel)air. Although our model ca,n 1)roduce filler terms and repair prior utterances, our chief concern is the tine structure of spoken discourse, which is closely related to incremental utterance pro(tnction.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>