File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/intro/92/m92-1038_intro.xml
Size: 2,932 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 14:05:24
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="M92-1038"> <Title>University of Massachusetts : Description of the CIRCUS System a s Used for MUC-4</Title> <Section position="3" start_page="283" end_page="284" type="intro"> <SectionTitle> INCIDENT DATE =NIL LOCATION =NIL </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> and the victim description is added to the victim stack.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="1"> S2: (we omit this sentence from the discussion - no alterations to memory are made ) S3: (GARCIA ALVARADO >CO &&56 >CO WAS KILLED WHEN A BOMB PLACED BY URBAN GUERRILLAS ON HIS VEHICLE )XPLODED AS IT CAME TO A HALT AT AN INTERSECTION IN DOWNTOWN SAN SALVADOR >PE) CIRCUS generates 5 CNs in response to this sentence. A simple CN describing a weapon is generated b y &quot;BOMB.&quot; More complicated CNs are triggered by &quot;KILLED,&quot; &quot;PLACED,&quot; and &quot;EXPLODED .&quot; The trigger &quot;KILLED&quot; creates a murder CN with victim = &quot;GARCIA ALVARADO.&quot; The trigger &quot;PLACED&quot; creates a location CN with instrument = &quot;BOMB,&quot; and actor = &quot;URBA N GUERRILLAS.&quot; This same CN also looks for a physical target inside a prepositional phrase, but it misses &quot;ON HIS VEHICLE&quot; because &quot;on&quot; is not one of the prepositions that it predicts . If the sentence had said &quot;outside &quot;, &quot;inside&quot;, &quot;by&quot;, &quot;near&quot;, &quot;in&quot;, &quot;under&quot;, &quot;opposite&quot;, &quot;across_from&quot;, or &quot;in_front_of', instead of &quot;on&quot;, we would have picked up this physical target. The omission of &quot;on&quot; was a simple oversight in an otherwise legitimate CN definition. This particular CN is specifically predicting a bomb since bombs are frequently the object of the verb &quot;t o place&quot; in this domain.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="2"> The trigger &quot;EXPLODED&quot; creates a bombing CN with instrument = &quot;A BOMB .&quot; Note that we miss the location San Salvador in S3. Although we have a bottom-up mechanism designed to find dates and locations, it doesn't always work. All 5 CNs are placed in a single partition which generates a new incident structure containing a single subevent: target/victim descriptions, and determines that this new subevent is compatible with the incident structure already i n memory. MBC therefore merges the two incidents, and memory acquires the fact that Alvarado was killed by a bomb.</Paragraph> <Paragraph position="3"> S4-7: (we omit these sentences from the discussion - no alterations to memory are made ) S8: (VICE PRESIDENT--ELECT FRANCISCO MERINO SAID THAT WHEN THE ATTORNEY @GENERAL@S CAR STOPPE D</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>