<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C96-2123">
  <Title>On the Structural Complexity of Natural Language Sentences</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="732" end_page="732" type="evalu">
    <SectionTitle>
6 Discussion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> We used the total length of the dci&gt;endency links in the definition of structural complexil,y. The examples ltresented in the previous sect, ions are also consistent w:ith a definition l;hat uses the inaximum length of structural links. The reasotL we choose to use the stnrt is that the definition naturally incorporate the length into consi&lt;lcration.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> 'I'hc arguments presented in previous s(;&lt;:l;ions arc preliminary. Our riga,re work inchldc backing up th('~ hypothesis with (;mph'ical cvidc.n&lt;:e and invest;igate the application of structtn'al complcxil,y in handling extraposition in parsing and generalion. null</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>