<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C96-1056">
  <Title>GRICE INCORPORATED Cooperativity in Spoken Dialogue</Title>
  <Section position="8" start_page="332" end_page="332" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
6 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> Comparison between our principles and (;rice's maxims has shown that there are more generic principles of cooperativity it\] human-machine dialogue than those identified by Grice. Three groups of principles reveal aspecls of cooperative dialogue left unaddressed hy the maxims. This produces a lotal o1' sevcn dialogue aspects, each of which is addressed by one or more generic principles (Table 1). Some generic principles subsume specific principles. It may be asked why Gfice was not aware of the Ihree generic aspects of dialogue partner asymmetry, background knowledge and recta-communication. It seems obvious that it cannot he because Ihese aspects arc absent from human-huntan spoken dialogue. More plausibly, dialogue partner asymmelry is ahsent from prototypical cases of human-hunmn dialogue; background knowledge is so perwmive as lo he easily ignored; and Grice explicitly was not concerned with dialogue failure pure and simple.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> The results from the comparison will\] Grice's tllaXilllS and from the user test suggest lhat the principles of cooperative spoken human-machine dialogue lllay represent a step towards a IllOle or less complete \]lid practically applicable set of design gtfidelines for cooperative SIJ)S dialogue.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>