<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="P95-1019">
  <Title>Response Generation in Collaborative Negotiation*</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="141" end_page="141" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
5 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> This paper has presented a computational strategy for engaging in collaborative negotiation to square away conflicts in agents' beliefs. The model captures features specific to collaborative negotiation. It also suppom effective and efficient dialogues by identifying the focus of modification based on its predicted success in resolving the conflict about the top-level belief and by using heuristics motivated by research in social psychology to select a set of evidence to justify the proposed modification of beliefs. Furthermore, by capturing collaborative negotiation in a cycle of Propose-Evaluate-Modify actions, the evaluation and modification processes can be applied re, cursively to capture embedded negotiation subdialogues.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>