<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C94-2112">
  <Title>On the Proper Role of Coercion in Semantic Typing</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="710" end_page="710" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
4 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> We ha.ve attempted to resl&gt;ond to specific criticisms rega.rding (:oercion o\[)erations in l.ii(, somantic inCerpreta.tion of tiaCura\[ laligua.ges. The t)rot)\]erns pointed ()tit I)y (lodar(l and Jayez (lo illust.rate that (:onditious ou coercion are a necossuary part of Clio semanCi(:s, but a.s we demonst;rate(l, thoso aro ah'ea.dy a.n ini;egra.l (;(Jiili)Ollelil, of Generative Lexicon Theory. hi t\]ie t)rocess of this discussion, we hi~ve reiterated the a(lvan-Cages of a, generative lexicon in tho (:ontext of tim larger theoretical and niothod&lt;&gt;logical issuos.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> More specili&lt;:a.lly, we showed how b(:/in a.ud co'm: mcnccrexhil~it both ra.isiug a.nd control i/eliavior, a.lld i, ha, t this is ;%11 instali('e o\[' the lal'g~or a\]Lorlia.tion class between causative and inchoativo vorl)s, itself an oxaniple (ff logical i)olyseiny.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>