<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="M92-1025">
  <Title>BOMBING ACCOMPLISHED &amp;quot;BOMB&amp;quot; BOMB: &amp;quot;BOMB&amp;quot; TERRORIST ACT &amp;quot;FARABUNDO MARTI NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT&amp;quot; POSSIBLE: &amp;quot;FARABUNDO MARTI NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT&amp;quot; DESTROYED: &amp;quot;-&amp;quot; &amp;quot;BODYGUARDS&amp;quot; SECURITY GUARD : &amp;quot;BODYGUARDS&amp;quot; PLURAL: &amp;quot;BODYGUARDS&amp;quot;</Title>
  <Section position="8" start_page="183" end_page="183" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> MUC-4 is a very difficult task, combining language interpretation at many levels with a variety of rules an d strategies for template filling. The examples here illustrate some of the important characteristics of ou r system as well as where future progress can be made . Not surprisingly, the major problems that remai n after MUC-4 are very similar to the ones that we identified at the end of MUC-3 . This by itself might see m discouraging, but the fact that the system did much better on MUC-4 suggests that we can expect mor e improvements in the future. While there is a class of phenomena that we haven't really begun to address (the body of world knowledge that contributes to interpreting events), there is also the ripe problem o f interpreting text in context, in which MUC has given the field a leg up .</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>