<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="C86-1026">
  <Title>The need for MT-oriented versions of Case and Valency in MT</Title>
  <Section position="4" start_page="122" end_page="122" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
7. Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> It has been the :intent\]on of th:is paper to nlake a statement about tile proper approach to the use of case and Valency J.n MT. On tile one halld, I have presented a proposal to abandon the old two-~Jerm Valency system ill favour of a new six-term system, and have explored the consequences of such a change.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> In connection with this, I have tried to show where Case fits in. What this research perhaps lacks at this point in time is empirical evidence that such an approach is valid, and an accompany:ing set of case names for the various relations. It could be argued that tlle latter is a prerequisite for the former, though I would prefer to claim that the demonstration of the validity of the approach and the elaboration of a 'comfortable' set of cases form an essenl;ially unif:ied research task. This paper, ellen , has explained tile Lheoretica\] background to such a Lask.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>