<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="T78-1023">
  <Title>ON THE ONTOLOGICAL STATUS OF VISUAL MENTAL IMAGES</Title>
  <Section position="3" start_page="169" end_page="169" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
3.0 Conclusions
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> On my view, the most parsimonious, straightforward accounts of all these data will include the notion that images are functional representations in human memory. I have no doubt that alternative non-imagery accounts can be formulated for each set of results, but the collection of each of these individual accounts will likely be more ad hoc, post hoc and cumbersome than the imagery accounts.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>