<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W05-1618">
  <Title>Towards Generating Procedural Texts: an exploration of their rhetorical and argumentative structure</Title>
  <Section position="6" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
6 Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> In this paper, we briefly shown the variety of structures, rational and somewhat irrational that organize procedural texts.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> We conducted this research with the main goal of generating responses in a cooperative way to a1 a2a5a4 a6 and a0a2a1a4a3 a6 questions. The long-term goals are to select the best text w.r.t. a user profile, and then to be able to integrate texts on the same topic to get a better text.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="2"> This preliminary step is now stabilized, and we designed an annotation tool, based on the grammar and related marks, to implement and evaluate our results. However, to get a more accurate view of the diversity of argumentation in this type of text, we need to also consider more subtle language forms such as: modalisators, tonality, opinion marks, evaluation marks, illocutionary force in injunctions, etc.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>