<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W04-1006">
  <Title>Legal Texts Summarization by Exploration of the Thematic Structures and Argumentative Roles</Title>
  <Section position="16" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
7. Conclusion
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> (29) Thus, to ensure that the judge presiding at the hearing on the merits can correctly assess the situation in light of all the material evidence, no reference or evidence filed by the Commissioner in the three affidavits mentioned above should be struck out.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> (30) This motion to strike by Air Canada with respect to the preliminary objections must accordingly be dismissed.</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="2"> Table 4: Output produced by the LetSum's modules: Thematic segmentation, Filtering and Selection. Source judgment is divided into thematic blocks associated with rhetorical roles, citation block will be removed in the filtering phase and textual units (shown in bold) have been selected as relevant. Law Research Center at the University of Montreal for their valuable suggestions. This project supported by Public Law Research Center and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>