<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<Paper uid="W00-1007">
  <Title>Abstract Anaphora Resolution in Danish</Title>
  <Section position="9" start_page="62" end_page="64" type="concl">
    <SectionTitle>
7 Concluding Remarks
</SectionTitle>
    <Paragraph position="0"> The adapted ES99-algorithm has been tested on two kinds of dialogue, that have been classifted by one annotator. Although the types of dialogue in the Danish test is quite different from that used by ES99, the results reported in the previous section (6) indicate that the algorithm performs as well for Danish as for Enghsh. Because the use of Danish pronouns, especially those referring to abstract objects, is different from the English one, these results provide an interesting evaluation of the algorithm. null As noticed by ES99, adding more lexical knowledge to the algorithm could improve its performance. I also beheve that the contexts of abstract anaphors should be studied in more dialogues, and that more attention should be given to the connection between discourse deictics and the relations that \]in~ pieces of discourse to each other (Webber, 1991; Fraurud, 1992; Asher, 1993; Kehler, 1997).</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="1"> Further work will thus consist in analyzing the occurrences of discourse deictics in both written texts and dialogues and paying additional attention to the relations linking pieces of discourse to each other (i.a. (Hobbs, 1979; Mann and Thompson, 1987; Polanyi, 1988) leThe use of especially generic plural pronouns in Swedish is discussed in (Fraurud, 1992).</Paragraph>
    <Paragraph position="2">  DD-vague 10 wrongly resolved plural 13 generic det 7 abstract nomina|~ 5 individual anaphora instead of DD (% abstract nominals) 6 ~rrong!y resolved DD 28 wrongly resolved individual anaphora (singular) 2 chaining errors 39</Paragraph>
  </Section>
class="xml-element"></Paper>