File Information
File: 05-lr/acl_arc_1_sum/cleansed_text/xml_by_section/abstr/96/c96-1043_abstr.xml
Size: 892 bytes
Last Modified: 2025-10-06 13:48:31
<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?> <Paper uid="C96-1043"> <Title>Evaluating and comparing three text-production techniques</Title> <Section position="1" start_page="0" end_page="0" type="abstr"> <SectionTitle> Abstract </SectionTitle> <Paragraph position="0"> What al+c the benefits of ttsing Natural \[~anguagc (;cneratio,t in an industrial apl+lication? We have attempt t<) answer part (}f this qttcsti{}n with at descripti(}n of an assessment {}f three techniques for producing multiscntcntial text: sentiatutomatic fill-in-lhc-blank interfacing, automalic linguistic-and-tcmphltes hybrid generation, and hunlall writing. This asscssIllol\]l used a black b(}x motlmdology, with ain independetlt blindtested jury that gave difforent quality levels in relation to a sot o1' criteria. The texts used for tile assessliicnt wcfc business reply letters.</Paragraph> </Section> class="xml-element"></Paper>